<%@LANGUAGE="VBSCRIPT" CODEPAGE="1252"%> The Community Foundation - Donor Guide
INVESTMENT POLICY OF THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTH ALABAMA


this is a very long document, please download the printable version

ADOPTED
APRIL 3, 1997
Amended August 29, 2000
Reviewed January 2003

 

INVESTMENT POLICY TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROLOGUE
PURPOSE OF POLICY
CONTEXT OF POLICY
ASSET ALLOCATIONS AND PORTFOLIOS
PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES
OPERATIONAL GUIDELINES
EVALUATION AND REVIEW
POLICY MODIFICATION AND REVISION
SHORT- TERM INVESTMENT POLICY
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

 

 

 


 




CONTEXT OF POLICY


Nature of the Foundation

The Foundation is a perpetual charitable organization which expects to have no regular funding resources, beyond its initial assets and the investment returns thereon.

Total Return Spending Policy

The Board expects to fund the Foundation’s grants and operating expenses from the total investment return generated by its investments, pursuant to this policy.

Committee’s Tolerance for Volatility

(a) Volatility of Investment Performance

A negative total investment return is acceptable for periods lasting up to 2 years. The Committee believes that this limitation will be sufficiently aggressive to realize an above average return, but will also incorporate a level of stability which avoids short term operating problems.

(b) Volatility of Grantmaking Capacity

To the extent the Foundation expects to fund at least some multi-year grants, in annual increments, the Committee considers that the annual volatility of the total value of the Foundation’s investment assets is important, but not controlling, in view of the need for the Foundation to use a significant amount of higher volatility growth assets, in order to both fund spending targets and also preserve purchasing power.

ASSET ALLOCATION AND PORTFOLIOS


Portfolios Available

It is the intention of the Board to offer three different portfolios to the Foundation’s Donors to allow them more flexibility in determining how their donated funds will be managed. Those portfolios are Aggressive, Moderate, and Conservative and the content of each is specifically set out below.


Asset classes to be used

The following seven asset classes will be used in the Foundation’s portfolios:

(1) Domestic, Small Capitalization Common Stocks

(2) Domestic, Large Capitalization Common Stocks

(3) International Large Capitalization Common Stocks

(4) Domestic Corporate Bonds (5-10 year maturities)

(5) U.S. Government Securities (7-10 year maturities)

(6) Dodge & Cox Income Fund

(7) Cash Equivalents

Long Term Target Allocations

The following target mixture of asset classes will be maintained for each donor portfolio type:

Conservative Moderate Aggressive All-equity Growth & Income Fixed Income
Portfolio Portfolio Portfolio Portfolio Portfolio Portfolio

Domestic, Small Cap Stocks 5% 5% 10% 10% 10% 0%
Domestic, Large Cap Stocks 20% 45% 55% 60% 45% 0%
Foreign Stocks, Developed 5% 10% 15% 26% 15% 0%
Foreign Stocks, Emerging 0% 0% 0% 3% 0% 0%
Intermediate Corp. Bonds 34.5% 19.5% 9.5% 0% 14.5% 30%
Intermediate Treasury Bonds 34.5% 19.5% 9.5% 0% 14.5% 0%
Dodge & Cox Income Fund 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 70%
Cash Equivalents 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0%
Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%


Allowable Ranges Around Target Allocations

At any point in time when an investment manager wishes to present what he considers compelling evidence for tactical, short term allocation shifts, the Committee will generally consider such requests.

Committee’s Attitude Toward Market Timing and Short Term Allocation Shifts

The committee wishes to allow its investment counselors and mutual fund managers the opportunity to practice their art without undue influence from the Committee. However, it is hereby made clear that this policy statement was the product of the Committee’s study of proven performance patterns in the capital markets. The Committee has reviewed considerable evidence that the passage of time causes the greatest rewards to accrue in favor of consistent investing approaches, and that the Foundation’s risk exposure could become an uncontrolled adventure, without reasonably careful adherence to the asset allocation guidelines in this policy. It is not, therefore, the general intention of this policy to allow short term judgments to introduce significant unplanned risk. The Committee recognizes that adherence to this policy will occasionally appear to be too risky or too conservative for current market conditions. But the Committee also recognizes that experts rarely agree about the near term direction of the capital markets, and that such opinions have generally proven to be a poor guide for action.



Unallocated Cash

The Committee will generally attempt to see that the Foundation’s assets include a cash reserve sufficient to pay annual distributions and expenses due within a reasonable future period. Therefore, any investment manager or mutual fund performing under this policy is not expected to accumulate a significant cash position, without prior approval of the Committee. In general, “significant” means more than 10% of the value of assets under his management.

Re-balancing of Asset Classes and Allocation of Net New Contributions

Because different asset classes will perform at different rates, the Committee will keep close watch on the asset allocation shifts caused by performance. Accordingly:

(1) the Committee will review the relative market values of the asset
segments, and will generally place new money under investment in
the category(ies) which are furthest below their target allocations in
this policy, and

(2) Rebalancing will typically occur as of any fiscal year-end at which the
allocations do not agree with those allocations specified in this policy.



PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES


Returns and Time Horizons

Nominal Returns

The Committee has examined market (index) returns for the last 27 years (1973-1999),
and observed the following:*

Average
Annual
Asset Class Index Return

Domestic Small Cap Stocks 9-10 CRSP 13.71%

Domestic Large Cap Stocks S&P500 14.17%

Foreign Stocks, Developed MSCI-EAFE 12.27%

Foreign Stocks, Emerging Select EmgMktFree (1) 20.995%

Int. Govt./Corp. Bonds Lehman Int. Govt./Corp. 8.83%

Cash Equivalents 1-Mo Treasury Bills 6.94%

(1) The Select Emerging Markets Free Index will be used in the implementation of this investment policy. For purposes of the asset allocation study, the DFA Emerging Markets Index-Equally Weighted, was used due to availability of data. Both will provide consistent exposure to emerging markets equities.


Asset Class Worst Best
Return Year Return Year

Domestic Small Cap Stocks -40.34% 10/73 104.02% 7/83

Domestic Large Cap Stocks -38.92% 10/73 61.01% 7/83

Foreign Stocks, Developed -36.65% 10/73 90.48% 10/85

Foreign Stocks, Emerging -46.11% 10/97 130.02% 10/88

Intermediate Govt./Corp. Bonds -2.25% 4/79 28.52% 10/81

Cash Equivalents 2.90% 1/93 14.80% 10/80


· We have examined all 12, 36, 60, 120, 180, 240, and 300- month periods on a rolling calendar quarter basis. The dates above mean the 12 month rolling period in which the return in question occurred.


Based on these results, the returns and accompanying risks of the various portfolios would have been as follows:


Range of Average
Annual Returns
Annual Historical Historical
Portofolio Return Std. Dev. Worst Best

Conservative 10.46% 7.45% -3.70% 23.57%

Moderate 12.08% 10.76% -13.18% 28.58%

Aggressive 13.09% 13.49% -19.54% 34.45%

All Equity 13.89% 15.99% -25.08% 39.69%

Growth & Income

Fixed Income

Expected Returns and Variability of Returns

The Committee realizes that the period 1973-1999 contains some exceptional years,
and that a more probable rate of return expectation might be developed by examining capital market returns for the period 1926-1996. The Committee has therefore used statistics presented by Ibbotson Associates to depict what capital market returns may be experienced. It should be emphasized that the returns shown below are historical and are
used here only to estimate potential results on a long term basis.


1926-1999 Range of Average Annual Market Returns
Annual Worst Best
Asset Class Return Historical Historical

Domestic Small Cap Stocks 11.99% -54.12% 161.43 %

Domestic Large Cap Stocks 11.35% -43.35 % 53.97 %

Foreign Stocks, Developed* 12.84% -23.20% 69.97%

Foreign Stocks, Emerging ** 22.69% -24.26% 117.51%

Long Term Corp. Bonds 5.58% -8.09% 43.79%

Intermediate Tsy. Bonds 5.21% -5.13% 29.10%

1- Mo. Treasury Bills 3.78% -0.04% 14.72%


* January 1, 1969 through December 31, 1999
** January 1, 1988 through December 31, 1999

Performance Benchmarks and Targets for the Fund’s Investment Managers and Actively Managed Mutual Funds

Market Indices

The Committee will, in general, use index mutual funds to achieve the benchmark returns and ranges of returns set out above. In some cases and from time to time, the Committee may find it appropriate to use an actively managed mutual fund or an investment manager. In those cases where an actively managed mutual fund or investment manager is used, the Committee expects that they will add value to the broad markets’ returns, net of fees. Accordingly, the Committee will consider performance to be adequate if the following margins are achieved:

Index Actively Managed Mutual Funds
and Investment Managers*

Domestic Small Cap Russell 2000 +10% of index return

Domestic Large Cap S&P 500 +10% of index return

International Stocks EAFE +10% of index return

Domestic Corp. Bonds Lehman Bros Corp Intrmdt +10% of index return

U.S. Gov’t Securities Lehman Bros Treas Intrmdt + 10% of index return


* After fees


Comparisons to Other Managed Funds

The Committee expects for each investment manager and actively managed mutual fund to perform within the upper one third of his peer group of other managers and mutual funds with similar asset mixes and investing styles.

Benchmarks and Performance Targets for Individual Investment Managers

Each of the Foundation’s investment managers will execute a specific Supplemental Agreement to this policy in which the Committee will recognize the peculiar strengths, philosophy, and style of the manager, within the overall guidelines and objectives of this policy. In particular, each such Supplemental Agreement will include a specific benchmark, peer group, time horizon and performance objectives for that manager.

OPERATIONAL GUIDELINES


Number of Investment Managers and Mutual Funds to be Used

The Committee expects to use the following mix of index mutual funds, actively managed mutual funds and investment managers. The Committee may change the mix from time to time as appropriate.

Index Active Separately
Asset Class Mutual Mutual Managed
Funds Funds Account

Domestic Small Cap Stock 1 0 0

Domestic Large Cap Stock 1 0 0

Foreign Stock, Developed 1 0 0

Foreign Stock, Emerging 1 0 0

Intermediate Corp. Bonds 0 1 0

Intermediate Tsy. Bonds 0 1 0

Cash Equivalents 0 1 0


Proxy Voting

It is the policy of the Committee to vote all mutual fund proxies received from the Fund’s custodian(s). The Investment Committee sets proxy voting policy. The Investment Committee’s objective is to uphold the interests of fund shareholders, to protect and enhance the value of portfolio assets.

The Committee will generally vote for or against proposals as indicated below. However, the Committee will exercise discretion at any time when normal voting policy would be inconsistent with the Committee’s primary objective.

THE INVESTMENT COMMITTEE VOTES FOR:

(1) Routine business decisions;

(2) Auditors;

(3) Election of directors. However, if the Committee has voted against a
management proposal, then the vote is withheld for directors. The Committee
will also exercise caution as to the election of “independent” directors as
noted below.

(4) Indemnification of directors.

THE INVESTMENT COMMITTEE VOTES AGAINST:

(1) Increases in management fees;

(2) The addition of new classes of shares, via “Hub and Spoke” arrangements;

(3) The addition of rear-end loads or distribution fees (pursuant to Rule 12b-1) on
existing classes of fund shares;

(4) Candidates for “independent” directorship known by the committee to have had prior
relationships with the fund advisor or sponsor;

(5) Increases in directors’ fees or retirement plans for same;

(6) Soft-dollar trading abuses where identified by the committee.



General Policy and Interpretive Notes

The Committee will generally consider any exceptions to the constraints in this policy within the overall context of the materiality of the exception, the context of its occurrence, and the expected longevity of the exception condition. It is further the Committee’s general approach that correction of exception conditions will not normally be considered an emergency. Reasonable time will be allowed for the Committee to consider any waiver request and to act prudently, if the exception requires action.
EVALUATION AND REVIEW

Frequency of Measurement

The Committee expects to measure investment performance quarterly.

Expected Interim Progress Toward Multi-Year Objectives

The Committee will follow its time horizons, as set forth in this policy, when making judgments about indications of inferior performance. However, investment managers for the fund should be advised that the Committee intends to track the interim progress toward multi-year goals. If there is a clear indication that performance is so substandard that reasonable hope of recovery to the policy’s target level in the remaining time horizon period would require either high risk or good fortune, then the Committee will not feel constrained by this policy to avoid an “early” decision to take corrective action.

Inconsistent Management Style Not Acceptable

As stated in other parts of this policy, the Committee will have little or no tolerance for an inconsistent investment approach. Therefore, the Committee will carefully monitor its investment managers and mutual funds on several key indicators of possible inconsistency:

(a) Changes in portfolio managers
(b) Surges in portfolio trading volume
(c) Evidence that actual portfolio characteristics do not follow the manager’s or mutual
fund’s published investing style, and
(d) Performance patterns not logically explainable in terms of the published style, or
performance out-of-step with manager’s style peer group.

None of these indicators is taken to be conclusive evidence of inconsistency. Such a finding would be based upon the facts and situation.

Frequency of Meetings

The Committee expects to meet with each of its separate investment managers at least annually. Meetings may be scheduled quarterly, but normally not more often, unless there is a special agenda.

POLICY MODIFICATION AND REVISION


Frequency of Policy Review

The Committee will use each of its periodic investment performance evaluations as occasions to also consider whether any elements of existing policy are either insufficient or inappropriate. Key environmental or operational occurrences which could result in a policy modification include:

(a) impractical time horizons,
(b) change in Foundation’s priorities,
(c) convincing arguments for change presented by donors or investment managers, and
(d) areas found to be important but not covered by policy.

Committee’s Philosophy Toward Policy Modification

The Committee will review this policy annually. The Committee recognizes that major changes to investment policy can produce potentially damaging inconsistency. Changes, particularly the type which can be characterized as reversals of direction, or “responses” to current market conditions from time to time, are viewed as particularly undesirable.

Short–Term Investment Policy

The following is an amendment to the existing Statement of Investment Policy. This language is intended to cover the management and administration of the Short-Term Portfolio. This investment alternative will not require prior approval by The Community Foundation of South Alabama’s Investment Committee.

PURPOSE OF POLICY

This document represents The Community Foundation of South Alabama’s Board of Directors’ goal of providing a short-term investment vehicle for the investment of funds that are not to be added to our long-term investment portfolios or that have been removed from our long-term investment portfolios pending distribution.

The Board recognizes that certain needs exist that cannot be properly accommodated by our long-term investment portfolios due to their short-term nature. The Board has decided to define short-term as any period of time that is reasonably expected to be less than two years. The Board anticipates that certain donors/agencies will be faced with the following circumstances and may request that they be allowed to invest in the Short-Term Portfolio for the duration of the need.

1. Many of our donor agencies are heavily dependent upon reimbursement of expenditures from various governmental agencies. These reimbursements are often delayed, forcing the donor agency to borrow money to cover the shortfall. Agencies may wish to “save” cash when surpluses are available. These funds would not be committed to endowment, but rather “saved” for used when such shortfalls occur.

2. Many donor/agencies are currently embarking on capital campaigns. They would like to have a vehicle in which to accumulate funds until such time as the capital goals are met and the funds are committed to new construction/acquisition or added to endowment.

3. Some donor/agencies may anticipate substantial withdrawals from endowment in order to finance expenditures or distributions. If such a need is anticipated within two years and such withdrawal exceeds the regular and recurring withdrawals ordinarily made from such endowment, they would like to have a stable vehicle in which to hold such funds until the actual withdrawal is made.

It is the intention of the Board that the use of this vehicle be restricted to those needs listed above. This is not a substitute for the existing Investment Portfolios and it is not intended as an investment vehicle for long-term funds.



CONTEXT OF POLICY

Nature of the Short Term Portfolio

The Short Term Portfolio is intended for investment of funds for which the investment horizon is less than two years. It is anticipated that any funds invested in the Short Term Portfolio will be withdrawn within two years of the date of the initial investment.

Committee’s Tolerance for Volatility

1. Variability of Investment Performance

Due to the short-term nature of the investments in the Short Term Portfolio, it is anticipated that most of the investment return of the Portfolio will be derived from interest income and that the yield on short-term instruments will vary greatly over time.

2. Volatility of Asset Values

It is the policy of the Board to invest in vehicles that are likely to exhibit little fluctuation in market value. While yield may vary greatly over time, the market value of securities in the Short Term Portfolio will remain stable.

CHOICE OF FUNDING MEDIA

It is the intention of the Board to use a single open-end investment company through which to invest the assets of the Short Term Portfolio. The Board will consult with the Investment Committee for its recommendations as to the most appropriate vehicle. Desirable characteristics are:

1. Investment in very short-term instruments, defined as having an average maturity of less than 3 years and an average duration of 1.50 years or less.

2. Investment in high quality instruments.


3. Investment in basic securities rather than derivative securities.

4. Low internal expense ratios and no sales charges, front end or rear end.


5. Sufficient size so that the Short Term Portfolio does not represent more than 3-5% of the total fund portfolio.

6. A documented record or preserving principal values, even at the expense of yield.

The specific investment fund chosen fo the short-term portfolio is The SEI Daily Corporate Income Fund A (SECPX) # 041.

PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES

Returns and Time Horizons

The Board and the Committee have examined the returns of 6-month Certificates of Deposit for the last 15 years, and have observed that the returns of the CDs are acceptable for the purposes of the Short Term Portfolio. The FDIC penalties impose a lack of liquidity that is unacceptable. Therefore, our target index is the 6-month CD. The Short Term Portfolio will not invest in CDs due to the imposition of the surrender penalty.

Trailing Time Period Performance Calendar Year Performance

YTD 2.84% 7/99 2.84%
1 Mo. 0.42 1998 5.37
3 Mo. 1.23 1997 5.57
12 Mo. 5.01 1996 5.09
3 Year 5.31 1995 5.98
5 Year 5.46 1994 5.00
10 Year 5.45 1993
15 Year 6.22 1992
1991
1990
1989
Based on these results, the returns and accompanying risks of the Short Term Portfolio for the calendar years 1989-1998 would have been as follows:

Average Annual Standard Historical Worst Historical Best
Return Deviation Return Return

5.73% 1.77% 3.28% 9.08%

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

The Investment Committee has provided the following information in question and answer format to anticipate frequently asked questions about charitable fund investment.


Q1. What is the purpose of the Investment Committee?

A1. The Investment Committee was formed to fulfill the fiduciary responsibility of The Community Foundation of South Alabama and to fulfill those same needs for other non-profit organizations that have charitable endowments at the Foundation.


Q2. Who is on the Investment Committee and what are their qualifications?

A2. Neil M. Kennedy
Education: BS in Marketing Management with Concentration in Finance- Auburn University
Company name: Merrill Lynch
Title: Vice President, Wealth Management Advisor
Experience: 16 years in the investment advisory business.
Mr. Kennedy is a member of Merrill Lynches Consulting and Advisory Service Group and a Certified Investment Management Analyst (CIMA).

Phil Maher
Education: BS in Economics (Major in Accounting) - Villanova
Company name: Morgan Stanley
Title: Vice President
Experience: 18 years in commercial banking and 15 years as an investment advisor.

Norman Pitman
Education: BS (with Distinction) – VMI
JD- University of Mississippi School of Law
Company name: N.D. Pitman & Company
Title: Investment counselor
Experience: 20 years in the financial planning and investment management fields.
Mr. Pitman is a Certified Financial Planner and a Certified Fiduciary Auditor.

Roger Wettlaufer
Education: BS in Accounting – Ohio State University
Experience: 20 years in public accounting
Mr. Wettlaufer is a Certified Public Accountant


Oliver Delchamps
Education: BS in Finance- University of Alabama
Company name: Morgan Keegan
Title: Vice President
Experience: 18 years in the investment business.

Neil Johnston
Company name: Hand Arendall, L.L.C.
Title:
Experience

Robert Hope
Education: B.S. Business, University of Alabama;
J.D. Cumberland School of Law;
National Graduate Trust School, Northwestern University.
Company name: Whitney National Bank
Title: Vice President and Trust Officer
Experience : 14 years as trust officer, personal trust and estate administration.
President of estate planning council of Mobile. Member Mobile and Alabama Bar Association.

Q3. I am on the Board of Directors of a local non-profit organization. What can the Community
Foundation do for me?

A3. The Community Foundation helps you fulfill your fiduciary responsibility to your organization by
making its investment policy available for your adoption.


Q4. How closely will the Investment Committee monitor my donated funds?

A4. The Investment Committee meets quarterly to review specific accounts, quarterly to review
investment performance, and annually to review investment policy.


Q5.What are the names of the various mutual funds that the Committee has currently selected?

A5. As noted on page 5 of the investment policy, there are varying mixtures of asset classes based on the
portfolio you choose. The specific mutual funds that the Investment Committee has chosen to
represent each asset class are as follows:

Asset Class Mutual Fund
Domestic, Small Cap Common Stocks Vanguard Small Capitalization Stock Trust
Domestic, Large Cap Common Stocks Vanguard Index Institutional Trust
International Common Vanguard Total Institutional Fund
Domestic Corporate Bonds Vanguard Intermediate Corporate Bond Fund
U.S. Government Securities Vanguard Admiral Int. Term U.S. Tres. Fund


Q6. Will I be notified if the specific mutual funds are changed?

A6. You will receive a statement of your account quarterly upon which any changes to the funds will be
shown.


Q7. Will I be notified if the investment policy is changed?

A7. Yes


Q8. May I attend the meetings of the Investment Committee?

A8. Yes. Simply call the Community Foundation office to find out the time and place of the next
meeting.


Q9. How often will I get a statement of my account and what will be on it?

A9. You will receive a statement of your account quarterly which will show the market value of your account at the beginning of the quarter, any transactions (receipts and/or disbursements), the account’s market value at the end of the quarter, and investment performance for the quarter.


Q10. How often may I make donations to various charities out of my account?

A10. You may make donations at any time that you wish.

Q11. When and how will I be informed of such donations?

A11. At the end of the quarter when you receive your statement. However, the statement will not show
individual donations. If you would like an itemized list, simply call the Community Foundation
office.


Q12. What are my alternatives if I’m not satisfied with the return that I’m getting on my grant?

A12. Your account can be closed and its balance transferred at any time. However, such transfer must be
made to a qualified non-profit organization.


Q13. How do change my account from one portfolio to another portfolio?

A13. Simply provide written notice of your wishes to the Foundation at any time, and change
will be as soon as is practicable.


Q14. If I have other questions, whom can I call?

A14. Please direct your questions to Mr. Tom Davis at the Community Foundation office. Mr. Davis
will either answer your question or put you in touch with someone who can.